Something in the Water Available

Something in the Water
By:Catherine Steadman
Published on 2018-06-05 by Ballantine Books

#1 NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • A shocking discovery on a honeymoon in paradise changes the lives of a picture-perfect couple in this taut psychological thriller debut—for readers of Ruth Ware, Paula Hawkins, and Shari Lapena. “A psychological thriller that captivated me from page one. What unfolds makes for a wild, page-turning ride! It’s the perfect beach read!”—Reese Witherspoon (Reese’s Book Club x Hello Sunshine book pick) If you could make one simple choice that would change your life forever, would you? Erin is a documentary filmmaker on the brink of a professional breakthrough, Mark a handsome investment banker with big plans. Passionately in love, they embark on a dream honeymoon to the tropical island of Bora Bora, where they enjoy the sun, the sand, and each other. Then, while scuba diving in the crystal blue sea, they find something in the water. . . . Could the life of your dreams be the stuff of nightmares? Suddenly the newlyweds must make a dangerous choice: to speak out or to protect their secret. After all, if no one else knows, who would be hurt? Their decision will trigger a devastating chain of events. . . . Have you ever wondered how long it takes to dig a grave? Wonder no longer. Catherine Steadman’s enthralling voice shines throughout this spellbinding debut novel. With piercing insight and fascinating twists, Something in the Water challenges the reader to confront the hopes we desperately cling to, the ideals we’re tempted to abandon, and the perfect lies we tell ourselves. Praise for Something in the Water “Arresting . . . deftly paced, elegantly chilly . . . [Catherine] Steadman brings . . . wit, timing and intelligence to this novel. . . . Something in the Water is a proper page-turner.”—The New York Times “With unreliable characters, wry voices, exquisite pacing, and a twisting plot, Steadman potently draws upon her acting chops. . . . A darkly glittering gem of a thriller from a new writer to watch.”—Kirkus Reviews (starred review) “Captivating . . . daring . . . The threats and increasingly bad decisions accelerate with Bourne-like velocity. . . . Steadman [is] a newcomer worth watching.”—Publishers Weekly “An unbearably tense debut with a knockout premise, Something in the Water had me hooked from the very first sentence. Thrilling and thought-provoking, it’s the perfect beach read. I devoured it!”—Riley Sager, New York Times bestselling author of Final Girls

This Book was ranked at 4 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of Something in the Water's Books is st80DwAAQBAJ, Book which was written byCatherine Steadmanhave ETAG "yibomqDeTbI"

Book which was published by Ballantine Books since 2018-06-05 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781524797195 and ISBN 10 Code is 1524797197

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "352 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction

This Book was rated by 1 Raters and have average rate at "5.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Do not you sort of hate how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads when perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now nude and unabashed within their variously efficient efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoke Do not you sort of hate how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby possibly fifty % (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed in their variously powerful efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were uniformly plainspoken, only effective, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- boring, boring, boring? Do not you type of hate when persons state'do not you think this way or experience like that'in an effort to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into accepting with them? In what of ABBA: I do, I do, I do(, I really do, I do). Properly, as the interwebs is just a world in which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to revisit yesteryear in its inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least until this site ultimately tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with a heavy string and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please understand that several a sic are intended in the following reviews.) its really difficult and ridiculous! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is excellent! There you have it. Refreshingly, not a review written in one of many witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal scream unleashed into the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and a quality that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of exactly the same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... which might be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you do not want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it absolutely was meant to be read, then it will be a novel, not just a play. On top of that the teach had us students read the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None people had see the play before. None of us wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. This compounded to make me pretty much hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to learn plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to see a play you then have sinned and are going to hell, if you believe in hell. Or even, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you could smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited you may anticipate others tokowtow to your petty linguistic rules. Creative phrase will free of charge by itself irrespective of how you are probably trying so that you can shackle it. Which is your cue, Aubrey. In my personal opinion, the particular enjoy Macbeth has been the particular worste peice previously provided by Shakespeare, and also this is saying considerably taking into consideration i also understand the Romeo plus Juliet. Ontop connected with it really is witout a doubt incredible story, unlikely character types along with absolutly discusting group of morals, Shakespeare overtly portrays Female Macbeth for the reason that correct vilian while in the play. Looking at the girl with mearly the style throughout the spine round and Macbeth themself is truely carrying out the ugly crimes, like kill along with deception, I can't realise why it's extremely effortless to visualize which Macbeth would likely be ready to try and do great rather then nasty if perhaps his / her spouse were being much more possitive. I think this have fun with will be uterally unrealistic. Yet this is in no way the actual ne and also ultra regarding traditional e book reviewing. Although succinct plus with no annoying inclination to be able to coyness or maybe cuteness, Jo's evaluation alludes to the bitterness consequently outstanding it's inexpressible. Just one imagines some Signet Vintage Versions broken into to pieces with pruning shears throughout Jo's vicinity. I personally don't like this specific play. So much so this I can not even give you every analogies as well as similes as to the amount I detest it. The incrementally snarkier form will often have reported a little something like...'I hate this specific enjoy just like a simile I am unable to appear with.' Not Jo. The girl talks a new organic, undecorated fact unhealthy regarding figurative language. As well as there is no problem by using that. When around a terrific even though, when you buy neck-deep throughout dandified pomo hijinks, it is a fantastic wallow inside the hog pencil you will be itchin'for. Thanks, Jo. I really like both you and your futile greedy with similes which can not technique the bilious hatred in your heart. You will be mine, as well as We're yours. Figuratively communicating, associated with course. And now and here is this examine: Macbeth by means of Bill Shakespeare is a good literary function inside Uk expressions, and anybody who disagrees is undoubtedly an asshole along with a dumbhead.