Two For The Dough look at

Two For The Dough
By:Janet Evanovich
Published on 1999-07-15 by Simon and Schuster

It's Stephanie Plum, New Jersey's |fugitive apprehension| agent (aka bounty hunter), introduced to the world by Janet Evanovich in the award-winning and bestselling novel One for the Money. Now Stephanie's back, armed with attitude -- not to mention stun guns, defense sprays, killer flashlights, and her trusty .38, Stephanie is after a new bail jumper, Kenny Mancuso, a boy from Trenton's burg. He's fresh out of the army, suspiciously wealthy, and he's just shot his best friend. With her bounty hunter pal Ranger stepping in occasionally to advise her, Stephanie staggers kneedeep in corpses and caskets as she traipses through back streets, dark alleys, and funeral parlors. And nobody knows funeral parlors better than Stephanie's irrepressible Grandma Mazur, a lady whose favorite pastime is grabbing a front-row seat at a neighborhood wake. So Stephanie uses Grandma as a cover to follow leads, but loses control when Grandma warms to the action, packing a cool pistol. Much to the family's chagrin, Stephanie and Granny may soon have the elusive Kenny in their sights. Fast-talking, slow-handed vice cop Joe Morelli joins in the case, since the prey happens to be his young cousin. And if the assignment calls for an automobile stakeout for two with the woman who puts his libido in overdrive, Morelli's not one to object. Low on expertise but learning fast, high on resilience, and despite the help she gets from friends and relatives, Stephanie eventually must face the danger alone when embalmed body parts begin to arrive on her doorstep and she's targeted for a nasty death by the most loathsome adversary she's ever encountered. Another case like this and she'll be a real pro. Two for the Dough is irresistible fun and powerful suspense entertainment from an acclaimed author who is already a national star.

This Book was ranked at 10 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of Two For The Dough's Books is V-5AV-yiq-UC, Book which was written byJanet Evanovichhave ETAG "bipnkEJCdVY"

Book which was published by Simon and Schuster since 1999-07-15 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9780684868530 and ISBN 10 Code is 0684868539

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "304 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction

This Book was rated by 133 Raters and have average rate at "4.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you sort of hate how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads wherein possibly fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations published by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed inside their variously successful attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were evenly plainspoke Do not you type of hate how we have entered the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby possibly fifty % (or more) of the evaluations written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now naked and unabashed in their variously successful attempts at being arc, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoken, simply effective, unpretentious, and -- above all else -- dull, dull, boring? Don't you sort of hate when people claim'don't you believe in this manner or experience that way'in an effort to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into accepting using them? In the words of ABBA: I really do, I actually do, I do(, I do, I do). Properly, as the interwebs is just a earth in which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to review yesteryear in their inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at least till this site finally tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's review of Macbeth in their entirety. I've bound it with huge rope and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please realize that several a sic are recommended in these reviews.) its actually difficult and stupid! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is excellent! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a review prepared in one of many witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Merely a primal scream unleashed in to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his power to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation by having an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions much more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's overview of the same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you don't want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it absolutely was supposed to be read, then it will be a novel, not a play. Along with that the teach had us students read the play aloud (on person for each character for a few pages). None of us had read the play before. None folks wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to produce me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you definitely have sinned and are going to hell, if you rely on hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists along with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age once we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow on your small linguistic rules. Artsy expression can cost-free themselves regardless of how you attempt in order to shackle it. That is certainly ones signal, Aubrey. With the impression, the enjoy Macbeth ended up being a worste peice possibly created by Shakespeare, and this also says a great deal thinking about furthermore, i read through her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop regarding it really is by now astounding plot, naive character types and absolutly discusting set of ethics, Shakespeare openly shows Lady Macbeth as the true vilian in the play. Thinking about she actually is mearly the particular express around the trunk spherical and also Macbeth him self is definitely truely doing the particular hideous criminal offenses, such as kill as well as scams, I can't understand why it's so quick to visualize which Macbeth might be willing to perform beneficial as an alternative to bad if perhaps his / her spouse were more possitive. I do believe this participate in is usually uterally unrealistic. Yet the next is in no way a ne as well as super associated with timeless e book reviewing. While succinct as well as with no annoying inclination in order to coyness or perhaps cuteness, Jo's evaluation alludes to a aggression consequently profound that it is inexpressible. One particular imagines a number of Signet Timeless Features compromised to help portions together with pruning shears around Jo's vicinity. I dispise this kind of play. It's of which Could not actually supply you with any analogies or even similes about just how much My partner and i despise it. A great incrementally snarkier form could have claimed something like...'I personally don't like this particular play similar to a simile I can not occur with.' Definitely not Jo. She addresses a new uncooked, undecorated truth of the matter not fit for figurative language. Plus there is no problem with that. Once around a great when, when you invest in neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it's a pleasant wallow from the hog put in writing you are itchin'for. Thank you so much, Jo. I like anyone with a futile gripping in similes of which are unable to approach the bilious hatred inside your heart. You might be my verizon prepaid phone, plus I will be yours. Figuratively talking, involving course. And from now on here i will discuss this examine: Macbeth simply by Bill Shakespeare is the foremost fictional operate from the Uk language, plus anybody who disagrees is definitely an asshole and a dumbhead.