A Higher Loyalty look at

A Higher Loyalty
By:James Comey
Published on 2018-04-17 by Flatiron Books

In his book, former FBI director James Comey shares his never-before-told experiences from some of the highest-stakes situations of his career in the past two decades of American government, exploring what good, ethical leadership looks like, and how it drives sound decisions. His journey provides an unprecedented entry into the corridors of power, and a remarkable lesson in what makes an effective leader. Mr. Comey served as director of the FBI from 2013 to 2017, appointed to the post by President Barack Obama. He previously served as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, and the U.S. deputy attorney general in the administration of President George W. Bush. From prosecuting the Mafia and Martha Stewart to helping change the Bush administration's policies on torture and electronic surveillance, overseeing the Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation as well as ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, Comey has been involved in some of the most consequential cases and policies of recent history.

This Book was ranked at 41 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of A Higher Loyalty's Books is 4CovDwAAQBAJ, Book which was written byJames Comeyhave ETAG "xJh9+FwXoOI"

Book which was published by Flatiron Books since 2018-04-17 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781250192462 and ISBN 10 Code is 1250192463

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "416 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryBiography and Autobiography

This Book was rated by 24 Raters and have average rate at "4.0"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you kind of hate how we've joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty percent (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed within their variously effective efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were consistently plainspoke Do not you kind of hate how we've joined the decadent phase of Goodreads whereby probably fifty % (or more) of the reviews written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually naked and unabashed within their variously effective attempts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you kind of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoken, just functional, unpretentious, and -- most importantly otherwise -- boring, dull, dull? Do not you sort of loathe when persons claim'don't you think this way or experience this way'in an attempt to goad you both psychologically and grammatically in to agreeing with them? In the words of ABBA: I actually do, I really do, I do(, I do, I do). Effectively, because the interwebs is a earth in which days gone by stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we can revisit days gone by in their inviolable presentness anytime we wish. Or at the least till this amazing site ultimately tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with much string and drawn it here for your perusal. (Please recognize that several a sic are recommended in the next reviews.) its really difficult and ridiculous! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that guide is good! There you've it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation prepared in among the witch's sounds or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal scream unleashed into the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) an adolescent, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of exactly the same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'here at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies he designs problems... which might be the case, for all I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you never want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to begin with, if it had been meant to be read, then it will be a novel, not just a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None folks had browse the play before. None people wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to make me virtually hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can actually fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between mcdougal and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play you then have sinned and will hell, in the event that you rely on hell. If not, you're planning to the DMV. I'm also tired of all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists together with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow to the small linguistic rules. Imaginative manifestation will probably free of charge themselves regardless how you attempt to help shackle it. That may be ones stick, Aubrey. Around my own view, the particular play Macbeth seemed to be a worste peice actually provided by Shakespeare, and also this is saying quite a lot looking at furthermore read his / her Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop associated with it's currently unbelievable plan, impracticable character types plus absolutly discusting set of morals, Shakespeare overtly molds Girl Macbeth because the accurate vilian while in the play. Thinking of she's mearly a tone of voice within the trunk game plus Macbeth himself is truely committing a horrible offences, which includes killing plus fraudulence, I really don't see why it's so quick to believe of which Macbeth would probably be inclined to undertake good instead of nasty but only if his / her partner ended up being a lot more possitive. I do think that this perform will be uterally unrealistic. Nevertheless the examples below is in no way a ne additionally extremely regarding typical publication reviewing. Even though succinct as well as without any annoying propensity so that you can coyness and also cuteness, Jo's review alludes to some animosity therefore outstanding that it is inexpressible. Just one imagines a few Signet Classic Features broken into so that you can bits using pruning shears with Jo's vicinity. I dispise this play. A case in point that will Could not even provide you with any kind of analogies or perhaps similes in respect of what amount I personally despise it. A strong incrementally snarkier sort may have stated a little something like...'I dispise this specific enjoy being a simile I can't come up with.' Not really Jo. She talks any organic, undecorated simple fact unfit with regard to figurative language. And also there is nothing wrong using that. The moment throughout a fantastic whilst, when you get neck-deep with dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a pleasant wallow from the hog coop you will be itchin'for. Many thanks, Jo. I love you and the ineffective gripping on similes in which won't be able to tactic a bilious hatred inside your heart. You happen to be quarry, and We are yours. Figuratively conversing, associated with course. And already this is our examine: Macbeth by William Shakespeare is best fictional function within the Uk expressions, plus anyone that disagrees is surely an asshole including a dumbhead.