The Hunt for Atlantis Learn

The Hunt for Atlantis
By:Bestsellers - Books USA Press
Published on 2007-01-01 by

A LOST CIVILIZATION. A DANGEROUS QUEST. A DEADLY SECRET. It’s one of history’s most enduring and controversial legends—the lost city of Atlantis. Archaeologist Nina Wilde is certain she’s solved the riddle of its whereabouts—and with the help of reclusive billionaire Kristian Frost, his beautiful daughter, Kari, and ex-SAS bodyguard Eddie Chase, she’s about to make the most important discovery in centuries. But not everyone wants them to succeed: a powerful and mysterious organization will stop at nothing to ensure that a secret submerged for 11,000 years never resurfaces. More than one would-be discoverer has already died in pursuit of Atlantis’s secrets—including Nina’s own parents. Failure isn’t an option. From the streets of Manhattan to the Brazilian jungle, from a Tibetan mountaintop to the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean, Nina and Eddie will race against time—and follow a trail of danger and death to a revelation so explosive, it could destroy civilization forever….

This Book was ranked at 38 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of The Hunt for Atlantis's Books is RHLbCAAAQBAJ, Book which was written byBestsellers - Books USA Presshave ETAG "Tf+iYiv7oL0"

Book which was published by since 2007-01-01 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is and ISBN 10 Code is

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have " Pages" is Printed at BOOK under Category

This Book was rated by 23 Raters and have average rate at "3.5"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is trueand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Do not you sort of loathe how we have joined the decadent period of Goodreads when probably fifty % (or more) of the opinions written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed within their variously efficient attempts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you kind of maple (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were uniformly plainspoke Do not you sort of loathe how we have joined the decadent period of Goodreads where probably fifty % (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually bare and unabashed inside their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of maple (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were evenly plainspoken, simply practical, unpretentious, and -- especially else -- boring, dull, boring? Don't you sort of loathe when persons claim'do not you believe in this way or feel this way'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into agreeing using them? In what of ABBA: I actually do, I do, I do(, I really do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is really a earth by which yesteryear stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we could revisit the past in its inviolable presentness any time we wish. Or at the very least till this amazing site ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's report on Macbeth in its entirety. I have bound it with huge string and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are recommended in the next reviews.) its really complicated and silly! why cant we be reading like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that guide is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not really a evaluation published in one of the witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal scream unleashed in to the dark wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his capability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation having an economy and a quality that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the same play. You might'know'MICHAEL; he's the'Problems Architect'at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in so it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to see is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks in the first place, if it was designed to be read, then it will be a novel, not just a play. Along with that the teach had us students see the play aloud (on person for every character for a couple pages). None people had browse the play before. None folks wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. This compounded to produce me more or less hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. Plus it really can fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to see plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play you then have sinned and are going to hell, in the event that you rely on hell. If not, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also fed up with all you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow on your petty linguistic rules. Creative expression will probably absolutely free themselves it doesn't matter how you might try to shackle it. Which is the sign, Aubrey. With my personal view, the particular perform Macbeth was the worste peice actually written by Shakespeare, this also says quite a lot thinking about in addition, i examine their Romeo along with Juliet. Ontop regarding it truly is already incredible plot of land, impractical figures and also absolutly discusting number of morals, Shakespeare publicly portrays Sweetheart Macbeth because the true vilian inside play. Considering the girl with mearly the particular speech throughout the trunk game plus Macbeth himself is actually truely carrying out a gruesome crimes, such as murder along with scam, I would not discover why it's very uncomplicated to believe in which Macbeth could be ready to try and do superior as opposed to evil if perhaps the partner were being more possitive. I believe that it perform is usually uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the next is in no way the ne in addition super involving traditional book reviewing. Although succinct and also without any annoying desire to help coyness or cuteness, Jo's examine alludes to some animosity thus powerful that it is inexpressible. A single imagines a handful of Signet Timeless Designs broken into to help chunks by using pruning shears within Jo's vicinity. I don't really like this play. It's that I can not also give you almost any analogies as well as similes with regards to the amount My partner and i detest it. A great incrementally snarkier sort might have mentioned something like...'I don't really like the following participate in just like a simile Could not surface with.' Definitely not Jo. The woman converse some sort of raw, undecorated fact not fit intended for figurative language. And also there is no problem using that. When in a great while, when you invest in neck-deep inside dandified pomo hijinks, it truly is a nice wallow from the hog dog pen you will be itchin'for. Appreciate it, Jo. I really like anyone with a useless holding on similes of which cannot approach your bilious hate inside your heart. You're my very own, and My business is yours. Figuratively speaking, connected with course. And now here's the critique: Macbeth simply by William Shakespeare is best literary function in the The english language expressions, and also anyone that disagrees is undoubtedly an asshole and a dumbhead.