The Romance of Lust: A Classic Victorian erotic novel Obtain

The Romance of Lust: A Classic Victorian erotic novel
By:Anonymous
Published on 2016-11-04 by

The Romance of Lust, or Early Experiences is a Victorian erotic novel written anonymously in four volumes during the years 1873–1876 and published by William Lazenby. The novel is told in first person, and the protagonist of the novel is Charlie Roberts. Charlie possesses a large penis, much virility, and a seemingly insatiable sexual appetite. The novel begins with |There were three of us — Mary, Eliza, and myself.” Charlie describes his sexual initiation as an adolescent — as he is |approaching fifteen”. He catalogs his sexual experiences including incest with his sisters Eliza and Mary, sex with his governesses, and his later sexual exploits with various male and female friends, and acquaintances. Besides incest, the book deals with a variety of sexual activities, including orgies, masturbation, lesbianism, flagellation, fellatio, cunnilingus, gay sex, anal sex, and double penetration. Taboo subjects such as homosexuality, incest, and pedophilia are common themes in the novel.

This Book was ranked at 2 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of The Romance of Lust: A Classic Victorian erotic novel's Books is Y5NuDQAAQBAJ, Book which was written byAnonymoushave ETAG "NwJgezUvkcI"

Book which was published by since 2016-11-04 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9783736418172 and ISBN 10 Code is 3736418175

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "541 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryFiction

This Book was rated by Raters and have average rate at ""

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is trueand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you kind of loathe how we have joined the decadent period of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty % (or more) of the evaluations compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now bare and unabashed inside their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you sort of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the nice ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all evaluations were consistently plainspoke Do not you sort of loathe how we have joined the decadent stage of Goodreads whereby perhaps fifty per cent (or more) of the evaluations written by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now actually naked and unabashed inside their variously powerful efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you sort of pine (secretly, in the marrow of your gut's merry druthers) for the great ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all reviews were evenly plainspoken, just utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- especially else -- boring, dull, boring? Don't you kind of hate when persons say'don't you think in this way or feel like that'in an endeavor to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically in to accepting together? In the words of ABBA: I really do, I do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, as the interwebs is really a world in which the past stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the current (and with fetish porn), we are able to review the past in their inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at least till this website ultimately tanks. Contemplate (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's report on Macbeth in their entirety. I have destined it with huge string and drawn it here for the perusal. (Please understand that several a sic are implied in the following reviews.) its actually complicated and silly! why cant we be examining like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at the least that book is good! There you have it. Refreshingly, not just a review published in among the witch's voices or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Only a primal scream unleashed to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teen, but I admire his power to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation by having an economy and a clarity that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's review of the exact same play. You could'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... which can be the case, for many I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that you do not want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it was supposed to be read, then it would be a novel, not really a play. Together with that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for every character for a few pages). None folks had read the play before. None folks wanted to read it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that appeared as if they weren't paying attention. All of this compounded to produce me more or less hate reading classics for something like 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can really fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the author and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and in the event that you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play you then have sinned and are likely to hell, if you rely on hell. If not, you're going to the DMV. I'm also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a note overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age when we are taught to respect each other's differences, it appears offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to expect others tokowtow to the petty linguistic rules. Imaginative concept may no cost itself irrespective of how you are probably trying to be able to shackle it. Which is your own signal, Aubrey. Within my personal opinion, the particular enjoy Macbeth ended up being this worste peice actually published by Shakespeare, this also says a great deal considering furthermore read her Romeo and also Juliet. Ontop regarding it truly is witout a doubt fabulous story, naive characters and absolutly discusting list of ethics, Shakespeare candidly portrays Lovely lady Macbeth as being the correct vilian while in the play. Considering she actually is mearly the tone of voice within the trunk around in addition to Macbeth him or her self is truely carrying out this repulsive criminal activity, including hard and also sham, I can't discover why it's so effortless to imagine in which Macbeth might be prepared to perform very good as opposed to wicked only if their partner ended up a lot more possitive. I do think that your engage in is definitely uterally unrealistic. However the examples below is undoubtedly a ne furthermore super regarding timeless publication reviewing. Although succinct and without having stealing attention trend in order to coyness or maybe cuteness, Jo's critique alludes to some animosity therefore profound that must be inexpressible. Just one imagines several Signet Traditional Designs broken in to to be able to chunks together with pruning shears with Jo's vicinity. I don't really like that play. Because of this that I can not actually ensure that you get almost any analogies or perhaps similes concerning simply how much I personally dislike it. An incrementally snarkier style might have explained something like...'I detest this kind of engage in such as a simile I can't surface with.' Not Jo. The lady addresses your natural, undecorated reality unsuitable pertaining to figurative language. In addition to there is nothing wrong along with that. As soon as around a terrific whilst, when you are getting neck-deep within dandified pomo hijinks, it really is a fantastic wallow within the hog pencil you're itchin'for. Thank you, Jo. Everyone loves anyone with a in vain clasping from similes that are not able to solution a bilious hatred as part of your heart. You're mine, along with My business is yours. Figuratively discussing, connected with course. And already this is my personal evaluation: Macbeth by way of Bill Shakespeare is a good literary operate within the English language terminology, and also anyone that disagrees is an asshole including a dumbhead.