What Happened Understand

What Happened
By:Hillary Rodham Clinton
Published on 2017-09-12 by Simon and Schuster

“An engaging, beautifully synthesized page-turner” (Slate). The #1 New York Times bestseller and Time Magazine #1 Nonfiction Book of the Year: Hillary Rodham Clinton’s most personal memoir yet, about the 2016 presidential election. In this “candid and blackly funny” (The New York Times) memoir, Hillary Rodham Clinton reveals what she was thinking and feeling during one of the most controversial and unpredictable presidential elections in history. She takes us inside the intense personal experience of becoming the first woman nominated for president by a major party in an election marked by rage, sexism, exhilarating highs and infuriating lows, stranger-than-fiction twists, Russian interference, and an opponent who broke all the rules. “At her most emotionally raw” (People), Hillary describes what it was like to run against Donald Trump, the mistakes she made, how she has coped with a shocking and devastating loss, and how she found the strength to pick herself back up afterward. She tells readers what it took to get back on her feet—the rituals, relationships, and reading that got her through, and what the experience has taught her about life. In this “feminist manifesto” (The New York Times), she speaks to the challenges of being a strong woman in the public eye, the criticism over her voice, age, and appearance, and the double standard confronting women in politics. Offering a “bracing... guide to our political arena” (The Washington Post), What Happened lays out how the 2016 election was marked by an unprecedented assault on our democracy by a foreign adversary. By analyzing the evidence and connecting the dots, Hillary shows just how dangerous the forces are that shaped the outcome, and why Americans need to understand them to protect our values and our democracy in the future. The election of 2016 was unprecedented and historic. What Happened is the story of that campaign, now with a new epilogue showing how Hillary grappled with many of her worst fears coming true in the Trump Era, while finding new hope in a surge of civic activism, women running for office, and young people marching in the streets.

This Book was ranked at 38 by Google Books for keyword Best Sellers.

Book ID of What Happened's Books is UjAIDgAAQBAJ, Book which was written byHillary Rodham Clintonhave ETAG "RGeD1PRs5CY"

Book which was published by Simon and Schuster since 2017-09-12 have ISBNs, ISBN 13 Code is 9781501175572 and ISBN 10 Code is 1501175572

Reading Mode in Text Status is true and Reading Mode in Image Status is false

Book which have "512 Pages" is Printed at BOOK under CategoryBiography and Autobiography

This Book was rated by 33 Raters and have average rate at "3.5"

This eBook Maturity (Adult Book) status is NOT_MATURE

Book was written in en

eBook Version Availability Status at PDF is falseand in ePub is true

Book Preview

Don't you type of hate how we have entered the decadent phase of Goodreads when probably fifty per cent (or more) of the opinions compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are actually nude and unabashed inside their variously effective efforts at being arch, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Don't you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's merry druthers) for the nice ol'days of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were uniformly plainspoke Do not you type of loathe how we've joined the decadent period of Goodreads where possibly fifty % (or more) of the reviews compiled by non-teenagers and non-romancers are now nude and unabashed inside their variously efficient efforts at being posture, wry, meta, parodic, confessional, and/or snarky? Do not you type of wood (secretly, in the marrow of one's gut's happy druthers) for the good ol'times of Goodreads (known then as GodFearingGoodlyReading.com) when all opinions were consistently plainspoken, only utilitarian, unpretentious, and -- most importantly else -- dull, dull, dull? Do not you type of hate when persons state'don't you believe this way or experience that way'in an attempt to goad you equally psychologically and grammatically into accepting together? In what of ABBA: I do, I really do, I do(, I actually do, I do). Well, because the interwebs is just a earth where the past stands shoulder-to-shoulder with the present (and with fetish porn), we could review yesteryear in its inviolable presentness any moment we wish. Or at the least until this amazing site ultimately tanks. Consider (won't you?) Matt Nieberle's overview of Macbeth in their entirety. I have bound it with huge string and pulled it here for your perusal. (Please understand that many a sic are recommended in these reviews.) their really complex and silly! why cant we be studying like Romeo and Juliet?!?! at least that book is excellent! There you have it. Refreshingly, not just a evaluation prepared in among the witch's comments or alluding to Hillary and Statement Clinton or discussing the reviewer's first period. Just a primal scream unleashed to the black wilderness of the cosmos.Yes, Mr. Nieberle is (probably) a teenager, but I admire his ability to strongarm the temptation to be clever or ironic. (Don't you?) He speaks the native language of the idk generation with an economy and an understanding that renders his convictions all the more emphatic. Here's MICHAEL's report on the same play. You may'know'MICHAEL; he is the'Problems Architect'only at Goodreads. (A problematic title itself in that it implies that he designs problems... that will be the case, for several I know.) This book shouldn't be required reading... reading plays that that you don't want to read is awful. Reading a play kinda sucks to start with, if it had been designed to be read, then it would have been a novel, not just a play. On top of that the teach had us students browse the play aloud (on person for each character for a couple pages). None of us had read the play before. None folks wanted to see it (I made the mistake of taking the'easy'english class for 6 years). The teacher picked students that looked like they weren't paying attention. All this compounded to make me virtually hate reading classics for something such as 10 years (granted macbeth alone wasn't the problem). I also hate iambic pentameter. Pure activism there. STOP the mandatory reading of plays. It's wrong, morally and academically. And it also can definitely fuck up your GPA. There's no wasteful extravagance in this editorial... no fanfare, no fireworks, no linked photos of half-naked, oiled-up, big-bosomed starlets, no invented dialogues between the writer and the review-writer. It's simple and memorable. Being required to read plays is wrong, and if you require anyone, under duress, to learn a play then you definitely have sinned and are going to hell, in the event that you believe in hell. Or even, you're likely to the DMV. I'm also fed up with whatever you smug spelling snobs. You damnable fascists together with your new-fangled dictionaries and your fancy-schmancy spell check. Sometimes the passionate immediacy of a message overcomes its spelling limitations. Also, in this age whenever we are taught to respect each other's differences, it seems offensively egocentric and mean-spirited to anticipate others tokowtow on your petty linguistic rules. Artsy phrase may free itself however you are trying so that you can shackle it. That may be a person's signal, Aubrey. Inside this impression, the perform Macbeth had been the actual worste peice actually compiled by Shakespeare, and this is saying a reasonable amount thinking about furthermore study their Romeo in addition to Juliet. Ontop with it is really presently fabulous plan, impractical people and also absolutly discusting set of morals, Shakespeare openly shows Woman Macbeth as the real vilian in the play. Looking at jane is mearly this speech with the trunk circular and also Macbeth him self is truely enacting the actual hideous violations, like murder in addition to sham, I would not discover why it's extremely easy to assume which Macbeth could be prepared to do beneficial rather than nasty only if his / her girl were more possitive. I really believe that it enjoy is actually uterally unrealistic. Nonetheless the following is undoubtedly your ne furthermore super involving typical e-book reviewing. When succinct plus with virtually no drawing attention tendency for you to coyness or even cuteness, Jo's evaluation alludes to a anger hence profound that it must be inexpressible. A person imagines a couple of Signet Classic Editions broken into so that you can chunks together with pruning shears with Jo's vicinity. I dispise the following play. It's which I am unable to possibly give you any analogies or similes as to simply how much My spouse and i not like it. The incrementally snarkier form could have said something like...'I don't really like this particular play just like a simile I can't occur with.' Not Jo. Your lover talks your fresh, undecorated fact unfit pertaining to figurative language. In addition to there is no problem by using that. One time with a great while, when you get neck-deep around dandified pomo hijinks, it is a good wallow from the pig put in writing you happen to be itchin'for. Thank you so much, Jo. I adore mom and her ineffective learning with similes that will can't solution a bilious hate with your heart. You might be my very own, in addition to My business is yours. Figuratively chatting, connected with course. And after this here's this critique: Macbeth simply by Bill Shakespeare is the best fictional function from the English language language, and also anybody who disagrees is an asshole and also a dumbhead.